cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
Therefore, if the intent to cause injury is proven and it can be further proven that from the ordinary course of nature, that injury would lead to death, that matter has become objective and also the intention to destroy (the main element that must
Some sites might specialize in specific areas of regulation, although others offer a broader database. Factors to take into account when selecting a website contain the comprehensiveness of your database, the ease of navigation, along with the availability of advanced search options.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Some bodies are presented get more info statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
extensive period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting of the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
The case addresses An array of issues which includes, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation on the right to life.
be proven without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This can be a horrifying reality, an especially very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
six. Mere involvement in a heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then he is at the rear of the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is no more needed for further investigation, therefore, his continuous incarceration would not provide any useful purpose at this stage.
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
When the petitioner is solely present for the place of incidence without causing any injury to your deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided through the uncovered trial Court after recording with the evidence.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Unless of course case is tried out(Bail Matters)
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]